I have written before about the constructivist viewpoint that each person creates their own reality. This is sometimes illustrated by the philosophical argument that I don't know whether the way you perceive the color "red" is exactly the same as what I see when I look at something red. Maybe the visual experience that you have in that situation is one that I would call "blue" if it were happening to me, but we have both learned to call the experience by the same word "red." There's a famous thought experiment in philosophy, called the " knowledge argument " about personal experience, from Australian scholar Frank Jackson (1982). In this story, a scientist named Mary has lived her entire life in a black-and-white room with no opportunity to see colors. (If that's too big a stretch for you, alternate versions of the story posit a neurological problem of some sort to account for her lack of color perception). Nevertheless, color is Ma...
It seems that 2026 was the year when "AI could kill us all" jumped from a fringe idea among sci-fi afficionados to a mainstream worry. Part of that was the cost of electricity and water going up due to AI data centers, along with their environmental impact in the form of excess heat. But even if we can solve those problems, e.g. through Google's plan to build solar-powered AI data centers in orbit, there's significant concern about AI agents themselves "going rogue" and doing things that are harmful to humans. It was a fear originally voiced by futurist Nick Bostrom in a cautionary 2014 book titled Superintelligence (an initially scary term that is, notably, now the White House's preferred name for AI). Bostrom argued that any AI with the capacity for self-improvement would eventually become super-intelligent , regardless of the purposes for which we originally intended it. A 2025 report suggested that both American and Chinese AI systems could a...