Skip to main content

Can TMT Explain our Vulnerability to Fake News?


A recent article found that computer algorithms can reliably distinguish between authentic and false news stories based on characteristics of the language used in the articles. The authors reported that “Specifically, legitimate news in tabloid and entertainment magazines seem to use more first person pronouns, talk about time, and use positive emotion words, which interestingly were also found as markers of truth-tellers in previous work on deception detection (Perez-Rosas and Mihalcea, 2014). On the other hand, fake content in this domain has a predominant use of second person pronouns (he, she), negative emotion words and focus on the present” (p. 9). It should be noted that in this study the authors constructed the true and fake news stories, but the characteristics that differentiated them may  still help to understand how fake news works in real-life communication. In this study, human raters were still fooled by the artificially generated fake news content about 30% of the time.

In Kahneman’s (2011) formulation of Two Minds Theory (TMT), System 1 — what we call the Intuitive System — is more easily fooled because it uses simple biases and heuristics to make decisions. Greater use of negative emotion words in fake news may suggest a tendency to play on people’s negative emotions, has been suggested as a vulnerability of the Intuitive System both in Kahneman’s version of the TMT. In our version of the TMT centered on the concept of temporal immediacy, a focus on the present in fake news also would be considered more consistent with the intuitive system. These findings therefore might be taken to suggest that the Intuitive System is more easily fooled, again in line with Kahneman’s overall argument.

Counter to this general line of thinking, our version of TMT would suggest that the use of first-person pronouns (I) is more immediate than third-person pronouns (he, she), and therefore more consistent with the Intuitive System. In this example, the article’s findings could suggest that the Intuitive System’s gut reactions are actually less vulnerable to deception than the Narrative System. Because all formulations of TMT identify emotions as Intuitive-level processes, the presence of positive emotions in genuine news might also be seen as an Intuitive-System cue.

Overall, then, the findings of this study on fake news have interesting intersections with TMT, but do not cleanly align one system with truth and the other system with falsity. Instead, it appears that both systems are implicated in people’s tendency to fall for fake news, although each system makes mistakes in its own way. The Intuitive System, as noted by Kahneman and others, can be fooled by negative emotions and a focus on current details without proper perspective. But the Narrative System also can be fooled by someone who uses abstraction to spin a good story and to distance listeners from their own experiences. Our formulation of TMT attempts to move away from simple dualisms in which one system always produces better results, and instead to look for the relative strengths and weaknesses of each.

To counteract the effects of fake news, it might be possible to train readers to look for signs of immediacy such as first-person pronouns because these can be signs of honest reporting, but to be wary of content that focuses only on the present and particularly of present-focused content that attempts to arouse negative emotions like fear and sadness. Learning to look for immediacy cues in language might help us all become better at differentiating truth from lies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Our Reactions to Robots Tell Us Something About Ourselves

Robot football players at a Valparaiso University College of Engineering event I have been thinking lately about robots, which creates an interesting asymmetry: They almost certainly have not been thinking about me. Nevertheless, I find that I often respond  to robots as though they have thoughts about me, or about their own personal goals, or about the world in which they exist. That tendency suggests an interesting aspect of human psychology, connected to our social minds . We are hard-wired to care what other people think about us, and we very easily extend that concern to robots. Here's a recent article about how the language-learning app Duolingo, which features an owl-shaped avatar (a kind of robot), uses "emotional blackmail" to keep application users engaged:  https://uxdesign.cc/20-days-of-emotional-blackmail-from-duolingo-4f566523e3c5  This bird-shaped bit of code tells users things like "you're scaring me!" and "I miss you" if they haven...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inside the Intuitive Mind: Social Support Can Facilitate or Inhibit Behavior Change

  This week I'm looking at another concrete tool in the behavior-change armamentarium, social support . I have written previously about the Narrative mind's strong focus on social cues , and indeed perhaps the Narrative system evolved specifically to help us coordinate our behavior with groups of other humans. As a behavior-change strategy, social support can be used in several different ways. Instrumental Social Support . The most basic form of social support is instrumental, the type of help that a neighbor gives in loaning you a tool or that a friend provides in bringing you a meal. This type of concrete support can be helpful for diet change -- e.g., here are some fresh vegetables from my garden -- or exercise -- e.g., you can borrow my tent for your camping trip. Although instrumental support is particularly powerful because someone is actually doing something for you or giving you resources that you don't have, it is also usually short-term (I probably don't want...
Post a Comment
Read more