Intention-Behavior Gaps in HIV Care

Last week at the bi-annual Ryan White Program Conference on HIV Care and Treatment, HIV care providers from across the country heard from the U.S. Secretary for Health and Human Services (DHHS), the head of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the head of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases at NIH. These experts highlighted a central fact of the HIV epidemic, which is that it has for the past 20 years been as much a result of gaps between intention and behavior as it has been a medical crisis. The HIV treatment cascade shown here illustrates the patient behaviors needed to successfully manage this chronic disease. First, people at risk for HIV can avoid infection through appropriate prevention behaviors, like using condoms or taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) medications. Once people are infected with HIV, they need to be tested in order to initate treatment. Then they must be linked to the care system, a barrier for younger people who may never have been involved with routine health care for a chronic condition. Once engaged in care, they must remain in care over time, and in order to gain the benefits of treatment they must stay adherent to medication. Each of these steps in the treatment cascade is one where patients' intentions may not match their behaviors, resulting in unnecessary health problems, gaps in care, or even treatment failure. Successfully supporting patients with each of these behaviors also requires health care practitioners to change behaviors, such as always testing for HIV or following up intensively when patients miss an appointment. Behavior change is a key to successful treatment in HIV and other chronic diseases.

Comments

In Pursuit of Digital Badges

What's the appeal of digital badges? I used to think that only a crazy person would be motivated to exercise just to move some electrons around on their smartphone screen. My phone would notify me that a new challenge was available each month, and I would routinely ignore it. I felt no pain or consternation about this -- in fact, I never gave it a second thought, or never notice the challenge at all. But for the past few months it seems that I'm among those who increase their activity level just because their iPhone tells them to (my latest badges shown above). Why does this seemingly stupid behavior-change strategy work, and why did it start working for me when it didn't help me before? First, it's important to know that rewards do motivate behavior. In a previous post on behaviorism I provided some background on how this works by training the Intuitive Mind. Two Minds Theory posits that the final stage before a behavior is produced by the Intuitive Mind (after proc...

What Years of Anxiety Taught Me About Balancing Two Minds

Guest post by Dr. Britt Ritchie, DNP, PMHNP-BC First, a huge thank-you to Dr. Paul Cook for inviting me to contribute here. Paul was my Division Chair when I worked at the University of Colorado (CU) as an assistant professor. During that time, he saw me at one of my most vulnerable points—grappling with anxiety so intense it almost made me abruptly quit my job. I knew it was social anxiety—the kind of fear marked by an overwhelming sense of being judged, embarrassed, or humiliated in front of others—but knowing the label didn’t make it any easier to manage in the moment. Because of that shared history, it feels especially fitting to write about my experience lecturing during my time at CU through the lens of Paul’s Two Minds Theory. I can still picture the lecture hall—the rows of students, the humming projector, the fluorescent lights that were both too hot and too bright. On paper, I was prepared. I had spent hours rehearsing, editing slides, and reviewing notes. ...

What You Believe about Beliefs is Probably Wrong

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines a "belief" as "the attitude we have, roughly, whenever we take something to be the case or regard it as true. ... Most contemporary philosophers characterize belief as a 'propositional attitude,' [where] propositions are generally taken to be whatever it is that sentences express. For example ... 'snow is white.'" Beliefs, then, (a) are expressed in language, (b) refer to some specific contents such as "snow," and (c) express some truth about those contents. The truth need not be an empirical statement about the world -- propositions such as "x is the square root of x-squared" are also beliefs under this definition even when there is no empirical referent for "x." Beliefs can be about a single thing, or about the relationships between things, in which case they might or might not be expressed as formal rules: e.g., "every bird has wings." Language, representation...

Two Minds Blog

Search This Blog