Skip to main content

Inside the Intuitive System: Craving is an Early Warning Sign for Opioid Relapse


Opioid use is an extremely a difficult problem to overcome. During work on a pilot project from 2017-2019 to increase the availability of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorders in rural areas of Colorado, we heard patients say things like "I don't have the willpower to resist opioids," or "I wish I were a stronger person." These statements reflect people's desire to change while also conveying the difficulty of changing opioid use. People often say that they don't choose to use opioids, rather they feel that they must use them in order to maintain daily functioning. The moral model of substance use treatment ("just say no to drugs") misses this important piece of the experience for people who are already using. And given that about three-quarters of people in our MAT project started their pattern of use with prescription pain medication, they may not have felt they had a choice originally either -- they use opioids now because their doctor prescribed them previously. As a result of this connection between opioid addiction and prescription pain medication, the disease model of addiction does not fit well for many people either -- it's hard for them to trust health care professionals who in their view got them hooked on drugs in the first place.

By the time people are physiologically dependent on opioids, they are generally not receiving a strong pain-reducing response from the drugs. Instead, people say they take opioids simply to feel normal. Chronic opioid use leads the brain to create more receptors for opioids, which then need to be filled just to maintain one's baseline level of functioning. Furthermore, the same opioid receptors are  involved in people's experience of everyday pleasant activities, which means that normal happiness is harder to come by because it delivers such a small level of opioid stimulation in comparison to drugs. Finally, a second brain system involving dopamine also gets activated by drug use, leading to euphoria and causing reward-seeking behavior (the dopamine response is centered in the lower-brain nucleus accumbens, which is also a primary driver of behavior within the Intuitive System). The brain's dopamine response to opioids is more akin to excitement or novelty than to pain relief, and is experienced as rewarding in a different way from the pain-relieving opioid effect. Like opioid receptors, dopamine receptors increase in the brain as people use drugs for a longer period of time, leading to a more intense desire for the experience and a need for higher levels of stimulation to achieve it.

The desire for opioids, often called craving, is an aspect of addiction that many people find especially difficult to overcome. Research shows that a sudden increase in craving often precedes an opioid relapse. The strength of this relationship is dramatic, increasing in the chances of relapse among patients who report strong cravings to 43%, compared to only 26% among those who do not. People who overuse prescription opioids have stronger cravings, lower pain tolerance, and more psychiatric symptoms than those who do not. Because of the dopamine response involved in craving, even minor cues that have been associated with past drug use can present significant risk factors for relapse. Even behavioral cues like a needle or a pill bottle might eventually provoke a low-level dopamine response, becoming part of the experience or a cue for drug-using behavior: In another study, patients who were deliberately exposed to drug-related situations or paraphernalia had higher cravings as a result, with a stronger effect for heroin than for prescription opioid medications. Finally, MAT dramatically reduces cravings within the first month, which may in part explain its effects.

In a recent project to improve services for patients with opioid use disorders, CU Doctor of Nursing Practice graduate Dr. Audrey Strock implemented regular assessment of patients’ cravings at four outpatient psychiatric practices. She used the Opioid Craving Scale as a way to measure patients' response to treatment at every visit with their psychiatric nurse practitioner. When craving increased, it meant that the patient might need extra support to maintain abstinence from opioids. Even though patients in this study were already relatively stable in treatment at the outset, their average craving score decreased by about 75% over 3 months of treatment, and remission rates improved from 80% to over 95% during the course of the project. This project further illustrates how attending to opioid cravings can improve the process of care.

The CU College of Nursing was recently named to lead a new $5 million initiative from the Colorado state legislature targeting the state’s opioid epidemic. Like the recent 2-year pilot, the new program’s goal is to offer more medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorders through NP- or PA-led clinics in rural areas of Colorado. MAT has two components, behavioral counseling plus a medication to block opioid receptors in the brain. In a previous blog post, I talked about how these two elements work together to reduce people’s desire for opioids while also increasing their coping skills to avoid opioid use. People can learn coping skills to tolerate the experience of craving, and need to be reassured that eventually the brain will return to baseline levels of opioid and dopamine receptors so that they can enjoy normal pleasant experiences once again. MAT neither blames patients for their addiction, nor suggests that they need to take a different drug indefinitely as a result. Instead, it creates a space in which the most destructive and self-perpetuating aspects of opioid addiction such as cravings are held at bay, while the patient practices new skills to avoid opioid use in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prototypes and Willingness: The Theory of Planned Behavior Revisited

  You may recall my blog post from last year on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , titled "in praise of a failed model." My evaluation of this model was that it accurately describes the Narrative Mind, which does control intentions. But the ultimate goal of the TPB is to predict behavior, and the relationship between intentions and behavior is weak at best -- in fact, it is entirely attributable to the fact that when someone says they don't intend to do something, they probably won't do it. When they say they do intend to do it, their actual results are no better than chance, a result of the intention-behavior gap as described in Two Minds Theory.  The full TPB is shown in this diagram: Cognitive constructs like attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (i.e., self-efficacy) are Narrative-system phenomena, and they do indeed have relationships with each other and with intentions (which are also products of the Narrative Mind). Perceived behavi...

Leventhal's Common-Sense Model and Two Minds Theory

Leventhal, Diefenbach, and Leventhal's (1992) "common sense model" of self-regulation. My 2018 paper describing Two Minds Theory (TMT) cites work by my colleague and coauthor Dr. Paula Meek, who conducted studies of patients experiencing the symptom of breathlessness due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Paula's research used a model by Howard and Elaine Leventhal (with Michael Diefenbach) that was an early iteration of the dual-process approach also used in TMT. She found that people who focused their attention on different aspects of the feeling of breathlessness then in turn had different interpretations of what that symptom meant for them, and that those interpretations changed their perception of the symptom's intensity. This example illustrates a back-and-forth between perceptions and thoughts, which is characteristic of Leventhal's model. Leventhal's dual-process model, sometimes called the "common sense model" of self-reg...

Intuitive Decision-Making by People with Diabetes

People with diabetes often find it challenging to maintain their blood sugar levels, in part because diabetes is a complicated disease. When the kidneys don't produce enough insulin fast enough to adjust for changes in digestion or activity, blood sugar can fluctuate rapidly, even over the course of a single day. To manage this, people with diabetes often need to make changes in multiple areas: adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, managing the timing and amount of exercise they get, keeping track of the times when their blood sugar rises and falls, potentially giving themselves a dose of insulin around mealtimes, managing stress, and other preventive measures as well.  But despite all of this complexity, the people who manage their diabetes most successfully are often the least  obsessive about the fine details. When my Dad was first diagnosed with diabetes, he checked his blood sugar often (using finger sticks; continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] devices weren’t yet a thing). Bu...