Skip to main content

Inside the Intuitive System: Why We Procrastinate

Did you know that you can subscribe to the Two Minds Blog?
Just click on the button with 3 horizontal bars at the upper right, enter your email address, and click the "get email notifications" button. Then you will get an email whenever a new blog entry is posted. You can also copy this address https://twomindstheory.blogspot.com, and post it into your favorite news reader program -- anything that accepts an RSS feed.

OK, enough procrastinating ... on to today's topic:


I wrote my dissertation on procrastination (yes, I got it done on time). In that study we worked with college students who identified themselves as procrastinators in doing their schoolwork. Procrastinators are an interesting example of the intention-behavior gap: They experience negative consequences like bad grades as a result of their own behavior, they are well aware that their own behavior is getting in their way, and yet they continue to waste time instead of studying. Many people become quite frustrated with themselves as a result.

One theory for why people procrastinate is that we have difficulty making distinctions between behaviors that are urgent and those that are important. An important item is one that has meaningful consequences for the future based on whether it gets done or how well it is done. For an academic like me, what’s most important is making progress on research projects. They lead to publications, new grant opportunities, and positive evaluations of my work by my peers. An urgent item, by contrast, is one that feels like it has to be done soon, whether or not it is actually important. In my daily life, meetings, phone calls, and emails are tasks that can seem urgent: A person wants to speak with me, or is expecting me to show up. The actual content of that conversation or meeting, however, may get me exactly nowhere in terms of the jobs that will actually have been important a month or a year from now.

The Intuitive System reacts strongly to a sense of urgency. That is, things that seem time-limited, that involve another person, or that provoke a strong emotion get prioritized by the Intuitive System. Some of my work responsibilities are genuinely urgent; others are not. But as the cartoon above suggests, I don’t actually get any better at sorting the important from the non-important as the number of tasks increases; instead, I actually seem to get worse at prioritizing, and spend more time on little tasks that don’t matter as much. A sense of urgency can also explain common time-wasting behaviors like surfing the Internet: There are little icons on my phone that tell me to check an app for a new message, or I wonder what news has happened while I was trying to write a paper, or I feel a need for connection with my friends and family after sitting at my computer for so long. These are all cues or social reinforcers that give the Intuitive System a sense of urgency — one that my long-delayed manuscript can’t hope to match. And completing little tasks often provides the Intuitive System with a surge of dopamine, which is reinforcing and serves to maintain the behavior. The most important tasks tend to be larger and slower by contrast, providing fewer opportunities for reward.

Fortunately for my efforts to write, the Narrative System is better at identifying importance. My long-term incentives align most strongly with getting research papers published in high-quality journals, and my Narrative System readily provides me with a story about the consequences of neglecting those incentives (its title is “publish or perish”). In fact, says my Narrative System, the optimal strategy for me to succeed in my work is to ignore as many emails and skip as many meetings as I can get away with, but not so many that I alienate my colleagues. In fact (goes the Narrative), the most rational course of action might be to show up for work only every few days and spend the rest of my time writing. In economists' language, the Narrative System is able to visualize the needs of my "future self," which does not yet exist but will by the time my next annual review comes around.

Neither the Narrative nor the Intuitive response is completely helpful in this case, but the Narrative System's priorities in this case are the ones that I would like to follow. Unfortunately, Two Minds Theory suggests that the Narrative System has no direct control over my behavior! From this we can devise a series of little strategies well-known to those who procrastinate, things like breaking large tasks into smaller ones and building in breaks or other rewards. The Intuitive System, which does control my behavior, likes those things. With the Narrative of publish-or-perish in mind, I can devise ways to trick or train my Intuitive System to accomplish the goals that I would like to achieve. Now I think it's time to stop procrastinating with this blog-writing and get back to my manuscript!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...

Inside the Intuitive System: The Mardi Gras Effect

Last Tuesday was Mardi Gras, traditionally a day of excess just before the start of the church season of Lent. Lent (from the Old English lencten  meaning "springtime") is one of two penitential times in the Christian church year, when people are asked to repent for their sins and engage in various forms of self-denial. Many people still talk about "giving something up" for Lent. It seems ironic, then, that the season of Lent should start with a scheduled day of debauchery, "Fat Tuesday" in French, when people are encouraged to eat pancakes or King Cake, drink alcohol, dress in outlandish outfits, and dance in the streets. The event even has theological underpinnings: Medieval clergy offered pre-planned absolution at the start of Lent on the day that is also called "Shrove Tuesday," from the Old English verb shrive (adjective: shrove or shriven) meaning "to offer forgiveness from sins." Lent always made a certain sort of sense to me fro...

The Multitasking Mind: Intuitive Thinking is a Set of Systems

We think of the Intuitive system as representing emotion, or impulse, or other negative attributes. But Plato and Aristotle also attributed positive functions such as love, empathy, duty, and honor to the Intuitive Mind. These examples show us that the Intuitive Mind isn't just one thing. Rather than describing it as a system, it may be more accurate to describe the Intuitive Mind as a set  of systems.  Evans and Stanovich (2009) suggested that Intuitive Mind activities have the common characteristic of autonomy , meaning that they are self-executing without a person paying any conscious attention to them. (This is clearly different from Narrative Mind activities, which require ongoing focus to maintain them). Some examples of autonomous mental processes are: jumping when you hear a loud noise (instinctive behavior), turning off your alarm when you wake up (Pavlovian learned behavior), checking for coins in the vending machine change drop (Skinnerian reinforced behavior), rem...