Skip to main content

Narrative and Intuitive Thinking as a Cycle

Did you know that you can subscribe to the Two Minds Blog?
Just click on the button with 3 horizontal bars at the upper right, enter your email address, and click the "get email notifications" button. Then you will get an email whenever a new blog entry is posted. You can also copy this address https://twomindstheory.blogspot.com, and post it into your favorite news reader program -- anything that accepts an RSS feed.


I’m excited to announce the publication of a major advance in Two Minds Theory! After the 2018 publication of TMT, I struggled to explain how the narrative system might have any effect at all on behavior. Based on many people’s experiences it seemed true that it did, but all my efforts to describe how led back to the old idea of the Narrative Mind as “executive control” and the goal of making people’s behavior more Narratively and less Intuitively controlled. This is similar to Kahneman’s idea that we would all be better off if only our “lazy” Narrative System would be more active.

Unfortunately, I also knew there was no room in TMT for any direct influence of the Narrative System on behavior — it’s a central point of the theory that narratives exert no direct control. You can also see this in your own experience: Imagine trying to catch a ball. If you take the time to think “now I am raising my arm; now I am opening my fingers; now I am wrapping them around ...” the result will be the ball hitting you in the face while you cogitate. The process of conscious thought is simply too slow to effectively oversee any of our everyday behaviors.

CU PhD student Laurel Messer solved my problem by suggesting that the relationship between the Intuitive and Narrative systems can be most clearly seen as a cycle. Her new cycle diagram, above, replaces the more linear diagram in our original TMT publication. Laurel’s version adds a time lag in between the Intuitive response and the Narrative one, which is a better representation than my original diagram showing the two processes in parallel.

In Laurel’s version of the TMT diagram, a stimulus leads to an immediate reaction at the Intuitive level of the mind, and this “gut reaction” then leads right away to behavior. The behavior in many cases then has consequences (recognizing of course that other consequences are delayed — eating a slice of cake now feels good, but maybe later I will regret it). By the time the Narrative mind gets to weigh in, all of these things are available data with which to construct a narrative — the stimulus itself, the subjective perception and emotional response, the behavior, and the consequence (at least the immediate one). The Narrative mind then has the role of commentator, observing the action and telling a story about what just happened.

In what way, then, does the Narrative mind affect behavior? TMT posits that narratives themselves can lead to different Intuitive-level responses. Laurel’s contribution was to clarify that the Narrative response comes too late to affect behavior THIS time around, but a new narrative can make a difference the NEXT time one finds oneself in a similar situation. 

The Narrative mind is still just one of many influences on the Intuitive mind, and much of Intuitive thinking remains a black box, so even with this new understanding we can’t expect people to suddenly become rational Narrative beings. But the new version of TMT might help to generate better understandings and methods or helping people change.

You can read Laurel’s full paper here. It also features an application of TMT to the self-management behaviors of adolescents with type 1 diabetes, a population that we haven’t discussed before. I’m excited by the many possible applications of this new way of representing Two Minds Theory. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Our Reactions to Robots Tell Us Something About Ourselves

Robot football players at a Valparaiso University College of Engineering event I have been thinking lately about robots, which creates an interesting asymmetry: They almost certainly have not been thinking about me. Nevertheless, I find that I often respond  to robots as though they have thoughts about me, or about their own personal goals, or about the world in which they exist. That tendency suggests an interesting aspect of human psychology, connected to our social minds . We are hard-wired to care what other people think about us, and we very easily extend that concern to robots. Here's a recent article about how the language-learning app Duolingo, which features an owl-shaped avatar (a kind of robot), uses "emotional blackmail" to keep application users engaged:  https://uxdesign.cc/20-days-of-emotional-blackmail-from-duolingo-4f566523e3c5  This bird-shaped bit of code tells users things like "you're scaring me!" and "I miss you" if they haven...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inside the Intuitive Mind: Social Support Can Facilitate or Inhibit Behavior Change

  This week I'm looking at another concrete tool in the behavior-change armamentarium, social support . I have written previously about the Narrative mind's strong focus on social cues , and indeed perhaps the Narrative system evolved specifically to help us coordinate our behavior with groups of other humans. As a behavior-change strategy, social support can be used in several different ways. Instrumental Social Support . The most basic form of social support is instrumental, the type of help that a neighbor gives in loaning you a tool or that a friend provides in bringing you a meal. This type of concrete support can be helpful for diet change -- e.g., here are some fresh vegetables from my garden -- or exercise -- e.g., you can borrow my tent for your camping trip. Although instrumental support is particularly powerful because someone is actually doing something for you or giving you resources that you don't have, it is also usually short-term (I probably don't want...
Post a Comment
Read more