Skip to main content

First Study Published Confirming Key Propositions of TMT

Two Minds Theory suggests that Intuitive-level variables have a strong effect on people’s everyday experiences and behaviors (and in fact, that only the Intuitive system is involved in producing behavior). Because the Intuitive system operates outside of conscious awareness, TMT also suggests that people aren’t aware of all the things that affect their immediate experiences and behaviors.

We tested these key propositions in study just published in the January/February issue of the Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, in which we used daily surveys and ambulatory sensor measures (Fitbit Alta HR devices) to predict everyday ups and downs in the experience of fatigue among people living with HIV. Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms reported by people with HIV, and it can seriously impair people’s ability to accomplish everyday tasks. We asked people to complete a validated short survey on fatigue every day on their smartphones, at random times. The surveys confirmed that people had more fatigue than would usually be seen in healthy adults, even though their HIV was under control with effective treatment. Most people’s fatigue also went up and down quite a bit over the 30 days for which we monitored them.

In relation to TMT’s first prediction, that everyday experiences come out of the Intuitive system, we found that daily fatigue was significantly related to physical activity, to sleep, and to stress. The stress relationship was seen on daily surveys, which are close to everyday experience but might still be measuring the Narrative rather than the Intuitive system. But we were particularly excited to also see a relationship between subjective fatigue and stress when we measured stress with a physiological metric called heart rate variability (HRV). Low HRV suggests an unhealthy stress response, usually because people have trouble recovering from stressful situations: Their heart rate stays elevated (so it shows less change, or variability) long after the initial stressor is gone. On the daily surveys, fatigue was particularly related to avoidant coping (not dealing with a stressor head-on), and with other chronic stressors like lack of control over one’s life, lack of social support, and the experience of stigma due to HIV. These findings mirror a previous study in which we used daily surveys to predict HIV medication adherence, and found in that case that the day-by-day measures were in some cases better predictors than a Narrative-level assessment like “on average, how has your mood been over the past 30 days?”

TMT’s second major prediction is that many of the factors that affect behavior are outside of consciousness. We confirmed this prediction using sensor data, which captured information on activity, sleep, and heart rate without needing to ask our participants directly. All of those non-conscious factors did in fact predict fatigue. But even more importantly, data from qualitative interviews showed that our participants themselves were not aware of these factors or their potential connections to fatigue. Our participants often said they were surprised when they saw their own Fitbit data, because they didn’t know how little they moved or how poorly they slept. The fact that these factors did predict fatigue, without our participants being aware of their own self-care behaviors, is a strong confirmation of TMT’s assertion that many variables affecting our everyday experiences are outside of consciousness.

You can read the full study here, or listen to a podcast in which I talk about the results. Thank you to my collaborator Dr. Mary Beth Makic who was PI on the study, and to our great research team.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...

Trump vs. Truth: the Whorfian Hypothesis Revisited

Image of protest against the 1918 Sedition Act during World War I. That act was repealed in 1920. Many concerning things have happened in the United States over the past month, but the one I'd like to write about today is an effort to win arguments by redefining terms. In a recent article titled "In Trump's Washington, Words Become Weaponized," the New York Times  presents a variety of examples in which the White House's recent Executive Orders use terms in ways that are unusual, or in some cases literally opposite from the term's plain-language meaning. Here are some notable instances (if you're up on all the news, you can skip to the part after the bullets, but I do like to document my sources): The term "DEI" (for  diversity, equity, and inclusion ) was used as a pejorative in President Trump's press conference after a January 30 airplane crash, in which he said that "we need to have our smartest people" as air traffic controll...

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...