Skip to main content

In Pursuit of Digital Badges

 


What's the appeal of digital badges? I used to think that only a crazy person would be motivated to exercise just to move some electrons around on their smartphone screen. My phone would notify me that a new challenge was available each month, and I would routinely ignore it. I felt no pain or consternation about this -- in fact, I never gave it a second thought, or never notice the challenge at all. But for the past few months it seems that I'm among those who increase their activity level just because their iPhone tells them to (my latest badges shown above). Why does this seemingly stupid behavior-change strategy work, and why did it start working for me when it didn't help me before?

First, it's important to know that rewards do motivate behavior. In a previous post on behaviorism I provided some background on how this works by training the Intuitive Mind. Two Minds Theory posits that the final stage before a behavior is produced by the Intuitive Mind (after processing inputs from within and outside the brain) involves a risk-benefit calculation: In the original theory diagram this is called a "strategic evaluation of alternatives." Having been rewarded for a behavior in the past will tend to increase its priority ranking on the Intuitive Mind's implicit list of alternatives, and will make the mind more likely to initiate that behavior. The benefit of rewards is well-known to anyone who has ever tried to implement a sticker chart for their children, or anyone who has ever been motivated to work harder for a raise or a promotion at work.

Second, the neurobiology of rewards is that they release the neurotransmitter dopamine in the ventral tegmental area of the lower brain. Areas of the brain that respond to rewards are also mostly subcortical areas like the nucleus accumbens and striatum, which I have elsewhere described as crucial to the Intuitive Mind's activity of selecting and initiating behaviors. The influence of rewards on our behavior happens mostly outside of consciousness, which fits perfectly with my experience of being motivated by digital badges: I don't consciously choose to exercise in order to gain a badge (that still seems stupid to me), yet I notice after the fact that I seem to be doing so! My experience here is a more virtuous manifestation of the same reward-behavior loop that can become dysfunctional in cases of opioid use disorder. Automatic links between rewards and behavior function to keep me exercising, so that I'm essentially a "badge addict." I exercise more without really meaning to. Again, this fits with my experience: My activity level has been increasing since I noticed the badges, but without any specific decision to do that on my part.

Third, the creators of digital badges are psychologically savvy, and they have made some design choices that increase their reward potential. For instance, the badges on my screen are attractive, with an enamel-like coloration that makes them seem solid despite their ephemeral nature. They spin in a three-dimensional way when I tap them, which provides some level of interactivity. And on the metallic-looking back of each badge is stamped my name and the date I achieved the goal, which creates a level of personalization. Each of these characteristics increases the chance that my brain will perceive the little icon on my screen as being worth a burst of dopamine from the ventral tegmental area.

A question that I haven't yet answered is why the badges seem to be working for me now, when they never did before. I have written previously about improving my exercise habits in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, because the costs of not exercising suddenly seemed to outweigh the costs of doing so. That's an issue of perceptions, which means my change in behavior relied at least in part on some input from the Narrative Mind. But the Intuitive Mind is the one that's responsible for actually getting me to go exercise, and it's more likely to do what's habitual than to consult my Narrative Mind for its latest views about the world. Research across different types of health behavior suggests that initial changes in behavior are likely due to some type of cost-benefit analysis. But after a behavior is established as a habit, a different set of variables becomes important. Habits are much more strongly driven by the kind of Intuitive-Mind considerations that digital badges capitalize on, and they don't rely so much on conscious input. In fact, many days I now find myself getting ready to exercise without thinking about it too much. (When I do stop to think about it, I still kind of wish that I wasn't). That's the power of the Intuitive Mind. By themselves, digital badges were too weak a reward to get me out the door and running. But after that pattern of behavior is established, the small reward provided by a badge seems to be helpful in maintaining it.

If you're reading this thinking that "exercising more than I meant to" is a good problem to have, you're right. But just trade out the word "drinking" for "exercising" in that sentence, and you will see that the basic principle of behavior change is identical to what happens in more problematic cases. If you want to develop an unintentional-exercise habit, you should know that it will probably take a while. Some recent research suggests more than 2 months of regularly engaging in a behavior is needed for it to become a habit, and the folks at Alcoholics Anonymous have a long track record of behavior change with their habit-forming rule of "90 meetings in 90 days."  Prochaska's stages-of-change model suggests that it might take as long as 6 months for a new behavior to become a habit. For me this seems about right: I started to increase the frequency of exercise in April or May, and I noticed the badges' effect on my behavior somewhere around November. For me, digital badges aren't really a tool for behavior change. But they have proven to be a surprisingly effective tool for maintenance of a new behavior over time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...

Inside the Intuitive System: The Mardi Gras Effect

Last Tuesday was Mardi Gras, traditionally a day of excess just before the start of the church season of Lent. Lent (from the Old English lencten  meaning "springtime") is one of two penitential times in the Christian church year, when people are asked to repent for their sins and engage in various forms of self-denial. Many people still talk about "giving something up" for Lent. It seems ironic, then, that the season of Lent should start with a scheduled day of debauchery, "Fat Tuesday" in French, when people are encouraged to eat pancakes or King Cake, drink alcohol, dress in outlandish outfits, and dance in the streets. The event even has theological underpinnings: Medieval clergy offered pre-planned absolution at the start of Lent on the day that is also called "Shrove Tuesday," from the Old English verb shrive (adjective: shrove or shriven) meaning "to offer forgiveness from sins." Lent always made a certain sort of sense to me fro...

The Multitasking Mind: Intuitive Thinking is a Set of Systems

We think of the Intuitive system as representing emotion, or impulse, or other negative attributes. But Plato and Aristotle also attributed positive functions such as love, empathy, duty, and honor to the Intuitive Mind. These examples show us that the Intuitive Mind isn't just one thing. Rather than describing it as a system, it may be more accurate to describe the Intuitive Mind as a set  of systems.  Evans and Stanovich (2009) suggested that Intuitive Mind activities have the common characteristic of autonomy , meaning that they are self-executing without a person paying any conscious attention to them. (This is clearly different from Narrative Mind activities, which require ongoing focus to maintain them). Some examples of autonomous mental processes are: jumping when you hear a loud noise (instinctive behavior), turning off your alarm when you wake up (Pavlovian learned behavior), checking for coins in the vending machine change drop (Skinnerian reinforced behavior), rem...