Skip to main content

New Article Explores How Adolescents with Diabetes Use Data to Make Health Decisions

 

How do people use data to make decisions? In a new study with Dr. Laurel Messer and colleagues, we explored the use of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The study is based on the idea of situational awareness as a predictor of successful self-management. 

Some of the obvious ways in which people might use data are as an immediate check on their current blood sugar, or as a tool to watch patterns of change in their personal blood sugar data over the course of a day. Perhaps contrary to what one might expect, neither the length of time since a person's last glucose check or the total number of times that they checked their blood sugar during the day predicted whether they were able to successfully manage their diabetes. (Successful control was based on a widely-accepted "time in range" or TIR measure of blood sugar over the course of the day). In fact, the more often someone looked at their CGM device, the worse their diabetes control was on that day! Just paying more attention to data, then, is not a clear recipe for success. 

Similarly, there was an inverse correlation between the number of alert messages someone received and their success controlling their diabetes (that one might have been expected, though, just because someone with worse control would tend to get more alerts). As has been seen in studies of nurses' behavior, receiving more messages might actually lead to "alert fatigue" that interferes with behavior change instead of supporting it. On the other hand, when adolescents actually responded to an alert message from their pump, their TIR did modestly improve. An even stronger predictive relationship was seen when adolescents used their pump proactively, entering a carbohydrate value for meals that they ate. Using the CGM device in that way was the strongest single predictor of successful diabetes self-management in this study. Adolescents' thoughtful interaction with the pump, rather than just viewing a blood sugar number or passively receiving a message, seems to have been key to their success. This is of course difficult for technology designers to automate, because the interaction needs to be started by the end-user rather than by the device. 

One other finding speaks to the cognitive aspects of situational awareness, and supports my earlier argument that situational awareness is less about Narrative-level logic and attention, and more about Intuitive-level awareness and expertise. We asked adolescents to predict their current or future blood sugar value, without looking at the value on the CGM device. The accuracy of those predictions was a significant predictor of their time in range. In particular, adolescents' blood glucose control was worse when they underestimated their current values (meaning that they thought they were doing better than they were). Adolescents had better time in range values when they didn't make that type of mistake (over-estimating their current blood sugar was less harmful to self-management). Because the adolescents were asked to make these predictions before checking their actual blood sugar result, accuracy means something more than just looking at the available data. It suggests that some adolescents had an intuitive-level knowledge of their current blood sugar that was separate from using the data available from their CGM device.

What does this study tell us about using data to make decisions? My take-away is that new data sources like CGM sensor devices can be a useful training tool, but that our eventual goal in interacting with these devices should be to develop our own expertise. Simply having data available or providing alerts didn't help in this study, and indeed it was potentially harmful due to alert fatigue. But proactively interacting with the data source to gain knowledge was helpful. And ultimately, people who had an accurate sense of their own body state separate from the data source were among the most successful in managing their diabetes, a finding consistent with the view that situational awareness is largely an Intuitive-level process that happens outside of conscious awareness. Sensor devices can provide us with helpful data, but we may be most successful over the long term if we use those data in a deliberate way, with the idea that eventually we won't need the device anymore.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prototypes and Willingness: The Theory of Planned Behavior Revisited

  You may recall my blog post from last year on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , titled "in praise of a failed model." My evaluation of this model was that it accurately describes the Narrative Mind, which does control intentions. But the ultimate goal of the TPB is to predict behavior, and the relationship between intentions and behavior is weak at best -- in fact, it is entirely attributable to the fact that when someone says they don't intend to do something, they probably won't do it. When they say they do intend to do it, their actual results are no better than chance, a result of the intention-behavior gap as described in Two Minds Theory.  The full TPB is shown in this diagram: Cognitive constructs like attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (i.e., self-efficacy) are Narrative-system phenomena, and they do indeed have relationships with each other and with intentions (which are also products of the Narrative Mind). Perceived behavi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leventhal's Common-Sense Model and Two Minds Theory

Leventhal, Diefenbach, and Leventhal's (1992) "common sense model" of self-regulation. My 2018 paper describing Two Minds Theory (TMT) cites work by my colleague and coauthor Dr. Paula Meek, who conducted studies of patients experiencing the symptom of breathlessness due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Paula's research used a model by Howard and Elaine Leventhal (with Michael Diefenbach) that was an early iteration of the dual-process approach also used in TMT. She found that people who focused their attention on different aspects of the feeling of breathlessness then in turn had different interpretations of what that symptom meant for them, and that those interpretations changed their perception of the symptom's intensity. This example illustrates a back-and-forth between perceptions and thoughts, which is characteristic of Leventhal's model. Leventhal's dual-process model, sometimes called the "common sense model" of self-reg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intuitive Decision-Making by People with Diabetes

People with diabetes often find it challenging to maintain their blood sugar levels, in part because diabetes is a complicated disease. When the kidneys don't produce enough insulin fast enough to adjust for changes in digestion or activity, blood sugar can fluctuate rapidly, even over the course of a single day. To manage this, people with diabetes often need to make changes in multiple areas: adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, managing the timing and amount of exercise they get, keeping track of the times when their blood sugar rises and falls, potentially giving themselves a dose of insulin around mealtimes, managing stress, and other preventive measures as well.  But despite all of this complexity, the people who manage their diabetes most successfully are often the least  obsessive about the fine details. When my Dad was first diagnosed with diabetes, he checked his blood sugar often (using finger sticks; continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] devices weren’t yet a thing). Bu...
Post a Comment
Read more