Skip to main content

A Fish Story


Here's a story about a very unusual experience that I had in connection with the Regenerating Images in Memory (RIM) technique that my research team is currently studying. It's a fish story, and like all good fish stories you can decide what you'd like to believe about it.

At the end of the fall semester, when everyone was overwhelmed with final grades and holiday events, my colleague Laurra Aagaard led an activity in our monthly faculty meeting to help us manage our stress. After asking us to close our eyes and breathe deeply, she asked us to descend into whatever part of our body felt like a source of calm in the end-of-the-semester storm. For me, this felt like sinking deep into my chest, but also like I was going deep underwater. It was calm and cool there, far from the activity back up on the surface. Laurra suggested that a resource would appear to support us. Because I was underwater, what I noticed near me was a fish. 

It wasn't just any fish. In fact, I realized that I knew this fish. Her name was Goldenflower, and she was a lyretail panda molly from my daughter's fish tank. The actual Goldenflower had in fact died about a month before this. But she was a very distinctive fish, and it was clearly her in my experience. Although I knew I was sitting in my chair in a conference room, with my faculty colleagues around me, I also very strongly felt that I was underwater talking to Goldenflower. 

I actually didn't like Goldenflower very much in life: She was the largest fish in the tank, and she seemed mean. She often swam aggressively at the other fish, sometimes biting them. There were baby fish in the tank a few times (mollys are live bearers), and we were pretty sure that Goldenflower had eaten a number of them. I distinctly remember thinking, "really? Goldenflower?" and checking again. Yes, it was definitely her, and no, she wasn't going anywhere.

Laurra asked us what message our resource had for us during this challenging time. OK, I thought, I will talk to the fish. When I asked Goldenflower what she wanted to tell me, she said this: "I am a big fish." Yes, I thought, and not a very nice one! "I am a big fish," she repeated. "When something gets in my way, I eat it." I then proceeded to argue with the fish. I told her that wasn't OK, and it seemed aggressive, and that it wasn't a good way to live. (My children find this part very amusing: You met your spirit animal, Dad, and you argued with her, they said. Yeah, that sounds a lot like you!) Goldenflower was impassive, and just repeated again "I am a big fish." The exercise was coming toward the end, and I demanded to know why she was telling me this. "You are a big fish," she said. "If you have troubles, eat them. Be a big fish."

That was it. I came up out of the water and back to myself, with more questions than answers. But I have returned to that message multiple times since, when something stressful comes my way. "It can't bother me," I think, "I am a big fish." This is not something that comes to me naturally. When I later told Laurra what I had seen, she laughed and said, "Paul, you're probably the nicest big fish I know." But perhaps it is an aspect of myself that I need more of, not taking things on that I don't need to own. It still feels a bit over the top to me, but something about the fish encounter gave me permission to change my own approach. The whole thing has a Jungian "anima" feel, as though Goldenflower was an aspect of universal consciousness breaking through into my own experience with a message I needed to hear. 

My experience is not atypical of what happens to many people during RIM. They frequently report that the imagery has a very intense quality, a "more real than reality" feel to it. There is also what's sometimes described as an "ineffable" quality, the idea that the experience is important but also difficult to put into words. Over time, other people in the participant's life often comment that something seems different about them, which is something that Laurra also reflected back to me. She said that I seemed more comfortable or relaxed in recent weeks, which might have been related to the fish encounter. 

Again, you can take this fish story for whatever it's worth. I thought it was an interesting example of the surprising truths that can sometimes bubble up from the Intuitive mind, in ways that the more logical Narrative mind was least expecting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prototypes and Willingness: The Theory of Planned Behavior Revisited

  You may recall my blog post from last year on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , titled "in praise of a failed model." My evaluation of this model was that it accurately describes the Narrative Mind, which does control intentions. But the ultimate goal of the TPB is to predict behavior, and the relationship between intentions and behavior is weak at best -- in fact, it is entirely attributable to the fact that when someone says they don't intend to do something, they probably won't do it. When they say they do intend to do it, their actual results are no better than chance, a result of the intention-behavior gap as described in Two Minds Theory.  The full TPB is shown in this diagram: Cognitive constructs like attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (i.e., self-efficacy) are Narrative-system phenomena, and they do indeed have relationships with each other and with intentions (which are also products of the Narrative Mind). Perceived behavi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leventhal's Common-Sense Model and Two Minds Theory

Leventhal, Diefenbach, and Leventhal's (1992) "common sense model" of self-regulation. My 2018 paper describing Two Minds Theory (TMT) cites work by my colleague and coauthor Dr. Paula Meek, who conducted studies of patients experiencing the symptom of breathlessness due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Paula's research used a model by Howard and Elaine Leventhal (with Michael Diefenbach) that was an early iteration of the dual-process approach also used in TMT. She found that people who focused their attention on different aspects of the feeling of breathlessness then in turn had different interpretations of what that symptom meant for them, and that those interpretations changed their perception of the symptom's intensity. This example illustrates a back-and-forth between perceptions and thoughts, which is characteristic of Leventhal's model. Leventhal's dual-process model, sometimes called the "common sense model" of self-reg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intuitive Decision-Making by People with Diabetes

People with diabetes often find it challenging to maintain their blood sugar levels, in part because diabetes is a complicated disease. When the kidneys don't produce enough insulin fast enough to adjust for changes in digestion or activity, blood sugar can fluctuate rapidly, even over the course of a single day. To manage this, people with diabetes often need to make changes in multiple areas: adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, managing the timing and amount of exercise they get, keeping track of the times when their blood sugar rises and falls, potentially giving themselves a dose of insulin around mealtimes, managing stress, and other preventive measures as well.  But despite all of this complexity, the people who manage their diabetes most successfully are often the least  obsessive about the fine details. When my Dad was first diagnosed with diabetes, he checked his blood sugar often (using finger sticks; continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] devices weren’t yet a thing). Bu...
Post a Comment
Read more