Skip to main content

The Tyranny of the Endless Scroll

People are fond of talking about social media use as an "addiction," and even describe the process of weaning ourselves off using it as "withdrawal." Research does suggest that social media use can produce a dopamine release in the brain's reward centers, and that it is particularly appealing for people (a) who have a generally less organized approach to life [low "conscientiousness" personality trait], and/or (b) have higher than normal levels of narcissism. Extroverts and introverts can both be heavy social media users, although for different reasons: Extroverts do it to enhance their self-perception or their own reputation, while introverts do it to compensate for difficulty connecting with people in other ways. 

Excessive social media use does have some documented negative effects, particularly for adolescents in terms of sleep deprivation, impaired academic performance, and increased suicidal ideation or behavior. High levels of social media use have also been implicated in the development of eating disorders among adolescent girls. However, social media also has some demonstrated positive effects, including the creation or maintenance of social connections, provision of information (particularly about health), and development of a sense of community. Interestingly, adolescents sometimes identify social media as a clear risk factor for others, but not specifically for themselves or their friend groups! 

Other negative effects of social media use have to do with the substitution of online relationships for real ones. If you have a teenager in your household, you might be accustomed to saying their name multiple times before you get an acknowledgement; if you complain about this state of affairs, you are likely to hear the counter-argument "but I was on my phone!" Adults also have difficulty unplugging from work at the end of the day, because email, Slack or Teams messages, texts, and other inputs keep on coming via our smartphones or watch notifications. Once engaged with a social media platform, the small dopamine bursts keep you engaged, perhaps for longer than you originally intended. Social media apps are also specifically designed to pull you back in with mechanisms like notification alerts, or gamification strategies that increase your engagement and make using the apps feel rewarding. But when social media serve up bad news, increased time spent on these platforms translates to worse mental health overall. The combination of ongoing use with negative consequences is what makes the behavior seem "addictive" to many people. 

To counteract social media's negative effects, some experts have recommended going on a "dopamine detox" by cutting off your social media use for a certain period of time. The evidence unfortunately is not supportive of that approach. One problem is that removing social media from your life doesn't actually decrease dopamine levels in your brain, even though using social media can provide a brief dopamine burst. The second problem with the "detox" approach is that people often return to exactly the same pattern of "addictive" use once their pre-set time away from social media has ended.

A better strategy to mitigate the negative effects of social media is to re-evaluate your relationship with the apps and your method of using them. A simple fix if you notice that you are distracted by social media checking or fear of missing out (FOMO) is to turn off notifications for those apps in your phone's preferences section. If you notice that you spend more time on an app than you intended, you can set a timer that reminds you of when you intended to stop. You can also manage preferences to control which types of posts you see, from which people, to avoid content that upsets or annoys you. All of these steps take a certain level of initial effort and self-awareness, but they can save your limited attentional resources over the long term. Limited social media use appears to be a more effective strategy for improving mental health than binge-and-bust cycles with intermittent avoidance of social media use.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Years of Anxiety Taught Me About Balancing Two Minds

  Guest post by Dr. Britt Ritchie, DNP, PMHNP-BC   First, a huge thank-you to Dr. Paul Cook for inviting me to contribute here. Paul was my Division Chair when I worked at the University of Colorado (CU) as an assistant professor. During that time, he saw me at one of my most vulnerable points—grappling with anxiety so intense it almost made me abruptly quit my job. I knew it was social anxiety—the kind of fear marked by an overwhelming sense of being judged, embarrassed, or humiliated in front of others—but knowing the label didn’t make it any easier to manage in the moment. Because of that shared history, it feels especially fitting to write about my experience lecturing during my time at CU through the lens of Paul’s Two Minds Theory. I can still picture the lecture hall—the rows of students, the humming projector, the fluorescent lights that were both too hot and too bright. On paper, I was prepared. I had spent hours rehearsing, editing slides, and reviewing notes. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Pursuit of Digital Badges

  What's the appeal of digital badges? I used to think that only a crazy person would be motivated to exercise just to move some electrons around on their smartphone screen. My phone would notify me that a new challenge was available each month, and I would routinely ignore it. I felt no pain or consternation about this -- in fact, I never gave it a second thought, or never notice the challenge at all. But for the past few months it seems that I'm among those who increase their activity level just because their iPhone tells them to (my latest badges shown above). Why does this seemingly stupid behavior-change strategy work, and why did it start working for me when it didn't help me before? First, it's important to know that rewards do motivate behavior. In a previous post on behaviorism I provided some background on how this works by training the Intuitive Mind. Two Minds Theory posits that the final stage before a behavior is produced by the Intuitive Mind (after proc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-Determination Theory Through the Lens of Two Minds

  Self-determination theory  (SDT) is a framework for understanding human motivation. It gained a great deal of popularity as a possible explanation for the effects of motivational interviewing  (MI), although MI's primary creator William Miller has said that his understanding of MI is atheoretical . It is certainly the case that MI came about long before SDT was used to explain it. And it's also true that SDT was an established model with its own body of research before it was ever linked to MI. But Stephen Rollnick, Miller's co-author in his most important works on MI, has specifically said that he considers SDT to provide the theoretical explanation for MI's success. Deci and Ryan (2000) propose six "mini-theories" or propositions that together make up SDT: 1. intrinsic motivation  is a strong predictor of behavior, and is related to feelings of competence and autonomy. The intrinsic/extrinsic motivation distinction is an old one in psychology, reflecting ...
Post a Comment
Read more