Skip to main content

New Article Finds Different Effects of Protective versus Adverse Childhood Events


In a new article, my former nursing honors student Linda Driscoll Powers wrote about the measurement properties of a survey called PACES -- standing for Positive and Adverse Childhood Experiences Survey -- developed by Dr. Laurie Leitch. The instrument combines items from the widely used ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences) measure with a set of protective factors such as having a supportive family, having a positive relationship with an adult outside the family, or belonging to social groups like a team or a church. ACEs items have been found to predict a variety of health outcomes in adulthood, either directly or by way of social support, but positive childhood experiences are under-studied. 

Besides having satisfactory psychometric properties (a stable factor structure, good internal consistency reliability, no evidence of response bias), the PACES items split cleanly into two independent subscales, one measuring positive experiences and the other measuring negative ones. The fact that these subscales were orthogonal (independent) to one another means that a person could have had negative experiences as a child, positive experiences as a child, both, or neither -- in other words, positive experiences aren't the same as just an absence of negative ones. There was also some suggestion in preliminary analyses that items measuring positive relationships within the family could be differentiated from positive relationships outside the family, but ultimately it made the most sense to group those items together for analysis, meaning that any positive relationship has about the same benefits, regardless of who it's with.

To me, the most interesting piece of Linda's paper was the comparison of positive vs. negative early experiences with a range of other measures. The data were gathered in a large sample (n = 589) of clients seen in rural Colorado treatment programs for opioid use disorder over about a year's time. In this group, a higher number of ACEs correlated with having more symptoms of depression, medical problems, and pain, more alcohol and other substance use, more current legal problems, and more psychological distress, as well as more family conflict, housing problems, and fewer economic and social resources. All of these relationships were expected based on prior literature about the later-life risks associated with ACEs. People with a history of childhood adverse experiences were also more likely to report having been victims of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse over the past 30 days, which in a previous paper we found to be associated with higher pain scores and therefore perhaps a higher risk for opioid use relapse.

We also found that the positive childhood experiences subscale was linked to less depression, a lower chance of hospitalization, more social and economic resources, a lower likelihood of legal problems, and less family-related distress. A couple of surprising effects were relationships between positive childhood experiences and current physical pain or health concerns, which we interpreted to mean that perhaps people were more in tune with their bodies and willing to ask for help. People with more positive childhood experiences were also more likely to be using prescription pain medication (e.g., as opposed to heroin or other street drugs). Nevertheless, the greater attention to current pain among people with more positive childhood experiences might suggest a unique risk factor for relapse. 

Overall, the most important conclusion from this study is that it's important for clinicians to ask about positive as well as negative experiences that people might have had in childhood. The different pattern of relationships with other variables for the positive and adverse experience subscales, and the fact that these scales were independent of one another, suggest that the two subscales of the PACES are likely to convey non-overlapping information. Asking about positive childhood experiences also can help clinicians to avoid an exclusive focus on deficits or problems, highlighting what has gone right in a person's life and what resources they might bring to current challenges. This fits with a strengths-focused approach to clinical care, and can help clinicians to support patients on their road to recovery.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Our Reactions to Robots Tell Us Something About Ourselves

Robot football players at a Valparaiso University College of Engineering event I have been thinking lately about robots, which creates an interesting asymmetry: They almost certainly have not been thinking about me. Nevertheless, I find that I often respond  to robots as though they have thoughts about me, or about their own personal goals, or about the world in which they exist. That tendency suggests an interesting aspect of human psychology, connected to our social minds . We are hard-wired to care what other people think about us, and we very easily extend that concern to robots. Here's a recent article about how the language-learning app Duolingo, which features an owl-shaped avatar (a kind of robot), uses "emotional blackmail" to keep application users engaged:  https://uxdesign.cc/20-days-of-emotional-blackmail-from-duolingo-4f566523e3c5  This bird-shaped bit of code tells users things like "you're scaring me!" and "I miss you" if they haven...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inside the Intuitive Mind: Social Support Can Facilitate or Inhibit Behavior Change

  This week I'm looking at another concrete tool in the behavior-change armamentarium, social support . I have written previously about the Narrative mind's strong focus on social cues , and indeed perhaps the Narrative system evolved specifically to help us coordinate our behavior with groups of other humans. As a behavior-change strategy, social support can be used in several different ways. Instrumental Social Support . The most basic form of social support is instrumental, the type of help that a neighbor gives in loaning you a tool or that a friend provides in bringing you a meal. This type of concrete support can be helpful for diet change -- e.g., here are some fresh vegetables from my garden -- or exercise -- e.g., you can borrow my tent for your camping trip. Although instrumental support is particularly powerful because someone is actually doing something for you or giving you resources that you don't have, it is also usually short-term (I probably don't want...
Post a Comment
Read more