Skip to main content

New Study Suggests That Fatigue is Most Detrimental for the Narrative Mind

I'm one of the authors on a new study by Dr. Mustafa Ozkaynak's research team, which looks at how emergency department (ED) nurses change their decision-making process when they become fatigued. In a previous paper, we found that fatigue was common in ED nurses, particularly toward the end of their work shift, and that nurses' fatigue was more often characterized as physical rather than mental or emotional -- in other words, this really represented being physically tired at the end of the day, not being burned-out or depressed. Nevertheless, physical fatigue has important effects on nurses' decision-making in the ED.

Based on nurses' qualitative reports, fatigue has mixed effects on their clinical performance. Nurses said that they definitely cut corners when they were tired, for example in terms of documentation in the electronic health record. They felt that they were less careful about double-checking things, and might be more likely to make snap decisions. We were particularly interested in whether this affected their antibiotic stewardship practices. The nurses believed that being tired did not change their clinical care outcomes, even though it did affect their process by making them cut corners, "satisficing" rather than optimizing their workflow. Nevertheless, they allowed for the possibility that they could be mistaken.

In general, Two Minds Theory suggests that the nurses' view of their own performance was likely correct. Although there is a well-known gap between people's confidence in their performance and more objective measures (the Dunning-Krueger effect), the gap is not as great as is commonly supposed. Furthermore, well-learned and highly-practiced behaviors, like a nurse providing clinical care in the ED, tend to be maintained by habit alone. That's true even when we aren't fully able to pay attention to what we are doing (e.g., because of fatigue). This highlights the fundamental power of the Intuitive Mind: Even when we aren't at our best, our so-so performance is still pretty darned good. Most of the time, we can get through life by relying on biases and heuristics. The fact that they often work is the reason that they exist in the first place.

The gap between nurses' optimal and fatigued levels of performance is most likely to become evident when a task requires focused attention, such as reading values from some clinical lab test, or when attention must be sustained over time, such as when performing a multi-step task. Attention is a limited resource controlled by the Narrative Mind, and nurses' reports suggested that their Narrative capacities were diminished when they became fatigued. It also takes Narrative-level work to overcome biases in situations where they may be too limiting. The old clinical adage "if you hear hoofbeats, think horses" is a good one 99% of the time, but it's wrong whenever a "zebra" situation comes along.

Mustafa suggests that nurses are more likely to default to Intuitive-level thinking when fatigued, and that they also have less capacity to override Intuitive-level thinking. The first part isn't necessarily a bad thing, because habits and routines can often carry the day. But when a task requires more attention, or when a nurse's Intuitive first reaction is wrong, that's when fatigue can lead to serious errors, because the backup Narrative system has been compromised by fatigue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Years of Anxiety Taught Me About Balancing Two Minds

  Guest post by Dr. Britt Ritchie, DNP, PMHNP-BC   First, a huge thank-you to Dr. Paul Cook for inviting me to contribute here. Paul was my Division Chair when I worked at the University of Colorado (CU) as an assistant professor. During that time, he saw me at one of my most vulnerable points—grappling with anxiety so intense it almost made me abruptly quit my job. I knew it was social anxiety—the kind of fear marked by an overwhelming sense of being judged, embarrassed, or humiliated in front of others—but knowing the label didn’t make it any easier to manage in the moment. Because of that shared history, it feels especially fitting to write about my experience lecturing during my time at CU through the lens of Paul’s Two Minds Theory. I can still picture the lecture hall—the rows of students, the humming projector, the fluorescent lights that were both too hot and too bright. On paper, I was prepared. I had spent hours rehearsing, editing slides, and reviewing notes. ...

Self-Determination Theory Through the Lens of Two Minds

  Self-determination theory  (SDT) is a framework for understanding human motivation. It gained a great deal of popularity as a possible explanation for the effects of motivational interviewing  (MI), although MI's primary creator William Miller has said that his understanding of MI is atheoretical . It is certainly the case that MI came about long before SDT was used to explain it. And it's also true that SDT was an established model with its own body of research before it was ever linked to MI. But Stephen Rollnick, Miller's co-author in his most important works on MI, has specifically said that he considers SDT to provide the theoretical explanation for MI's success. Deci and Ryan (2000) propose six "mini-theories" or propositions that together make up SDT: 1. intrinsic motivation  is a strong predictor of behavior, and is related to feelings of competence and autonomy. The intrinsic/extrinsic motivation distinction is an old one in psychology, reflecting ...

In Pursuit of Digital Badges

  What's the appeal of digital badges? I used to think that only a crazy person would be motivated to exercise just to move some electrons around on their smartphone screen. My phone would notify me that a new challenge was available each month, and I would routinely ignore it. I felt no pain or consternation about this -- in fact, I never gave it a second thought, or never notice the challenge at all. But for the past few months it seems that I'm among those who increase their activity level just because their iPhone tells them to (my latest badges shown above). Why does this seemingly stupid behavior-change strategy work, and why did it start working for me when it didn't help me before? First, it's important to know that rewards do motivate behavior. In a previous post on behaviorism I provided some background on how this works by training the Intuitive Mind. Two Minds Theory posits that the final stage before a behavior is produced by the Intuitive Mind (after proc...