Skip to main content

New Article on the Link Between Exercise and Mood

 

I have written previously about the link between exercise and mood, including the consistent research finding that aerobic exercise is just as effective in treating depression as either psychotherapy or medication. This week, I'm excited to share a new multi-national research collaboration that I was able to participate in, looking at the mood-exercise linkage in a different way. 

In our just-published article, a German research team conducted a within-person meta-analysis, meaning that they merged raw data from 69 different studies across 14 countries to draw overall conclusions. Each of these studies (including one of mine) measured exercise parameters using an accelerometer -- either a research-grade device like Actigraph, or a commercial-grade tracker such as a Fitbit, AppleWatch, or Garmin wristband. Each of the studies also collected daily survey data on a measure of mood or subjective well-being. The combination of daily exercise tracking with daily survey data allowed for tests of the relationship between mood and exercise in two different directions:

            1. Mood before exercising -> more or less subsequent exercise

            2. Amount of exercise -> score on a subsequent measure of mood

Although direction #2 is the one that we are often most interested in, suggesting that exercising makes you happier, there's an important confound when direction #1 is not also considered. For example, people who are happier to start with might be more likely to go out for a run. Or people who have already exercised might remember their initial mood to have been worse when a retrospective study design is used. In some of the foundational work for Two Minds Theory, I have shown that people are particularly bad at retrospectively reporting their previous emotional states. 

My colleagues' analysis found that direction #2 was the best-supported by evidence. Exercising does indeed lead to better mood later on, including feelings of contentment ("valence," r = .06), happiness or good cheer ("positive affect," r = .07), and feeling more energetic and awake ("energetic arousal," r = .14). These aren't very strong relationships, but they are noteworthy because they show a consistently positive effect across many studies, despite extremely high levels of variability in the types of people studied, international contexts of the studies, and measurement tools utilized. The particularly strong relationship between exercise and subsequent energy levels makes sense in terms of improved physical fitness, but it's the opposite of what many people say is their reason for not exercising: That if they do, they will feel tired. In fact, the research overall suggests that they would feel more energized later on instead of less. In contrast to these findings, there was no evidence for direction #1 in the relationship between mood and exercise: So you can start exercising no matter how you currently feel, and reasonably expect to feel better. The findings were consistent across participants of different genders, ages, body mass index, and other demographic characteristics.

One surprising finding was that exercise did not necessarily reduce participants' level of Negative Affect (i.e., feeling sad, anxious, or angry). It is known that Positive and Negative Affect are at least somewhat independent of one another, with people able to truthfully say that they feel both sad and happy at the same time. The lack of a consistent effect of exercise on Negative Affect (in either direction) suggests that positive feelings are more strongly related to physical activity than negative ones. Exercising might not make negative feelings go away, then -- but it might still make them feel more bearable.

I'm delighted to have been able to contribute to this massive analysis, which provides the best evidence to date about the nature of the relationship between physical activity and emotional well-being. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Years of Anxiety Taught Me About Balancing Two Minds

  Guest post by Dr. Britt Ritchie, DNP, PMHNP-BC   First, a huge thank-you to Dr. Paul Cook for inviting me to contribute here. Paul was my Division Chair when I worked at the University of Colorado (CU) as an assistant professor. During that time, he saw me at one of my most vulnerable points—grappling with anxiety so intense it almost made me abruptly quit my job. I knew it was social anxiety—the kind of fear marked by an overwhelming sense of being judged, embarrassed, or humiliated in front of others—but knowing the label didn’t make it any easier to manage in the moment. Because of that shared history, it feels especially fitting to write about my experience lecturing during my time at CU through the lens of Paul’s Two Minds Theory. I can still picture the lecture hall—the rows of students, the humming projector, the fluorescent lights that were both too hot and too bright. On paper, I was prepared. I had spent hours rehearsing, editing slides, and reviewing notes. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Pursuit of Digital Badges

  What's the appeal of digital badges? I used to think that only a crazy person would be motivated to exercise just to move some electrons around on their smartphone screen. My phone would notify me that a new challenge was available each month, and I would routinely ignore it. I felt no pain or consternation about this -- in fact, I never gave it a second thought, or never notice the challenge at all. But for the past few months it seems that I'm among those who increase their activity level just because their iPhone tells them to (my latest badges shown above). Why does this seemingly stupid behavior-change strategy work, and why did it start working for me when it didn't help me before? First, it's important to know that rewards do motivate behavior. In a previous post on behaviorism I provided some background on how this works by training the Intuitive Mind. Two Minds Theory posits that the final stage before a behavior is produced by the Intuitive Mind (after proc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-Determination Theory Through the Lens of Two Minds

  Self-determination theory  (SDT) is a framework for understanding human motivation. It gained a great deal of popularity as a possible explanation for the effects of motivational interviewing  (MI), although MI's primary creator William Miller has said that his understanding of MI is atheoretical . It is certainly the case that MI came about long before SDT was used to explain it. And it's also true that SDT was an established model with its own body of research before it was ever linked to MI. But Stephen Rollnick, Miller's co-author in his most important works on MI, has specifically said that he considers SDT to provide the theoretical explanation for MI's success. Deci and Ryan (2000) propose six "mini-theories" or propositions that together make up SDT: 1. intrinsic motivation  is a strong predictor of behavior, and is related to feelings of competence and autonomy. The intrinsic/extrinsic motivation distinction is an old one in psychology, reflecting ...
Post a Comment
Read more