Skip to main content

What to Watch for in 2020

I have been writing this blog for just over a year. My initial commitment to myself was that I would try it for 6 months, and if nobody cared or I ran out of things to say I would drop it. That hasn’t happened — there have been about 350 unique readers in the first year, and my list of ideas for posts is longer now than when I started. Both of those seem like promising signs. Still, 350 isn’t a lot in the world of the Internet, even for a somewhat specialized academic blog like this one. So if you like an idea that you read in this space, please comment, repost, or otherwise pass it along. I will keep trying to get the page out to new readers, and I’d appreciate your help.

Here is some of what you can look for in this space in 2020:
•  More on mindfulness – previous posts on how mindfulness can help us to comment the Narrative and the Intuitive Minds, and the use of new sensor technologies to study mindfulness, were each very popular. In 2020 I plan to explore the current state of mindfulness research, new directions that have been suggested in the literature, and how Two Minds Theory can help.
•  More case studies – I wrote posts in 2019 on “the two minds of …” various people, including Christian apologist C. S. Lewis, former U.S. Prosecutor Preet Bharara, and my good friend Cliston BrownLook for more of these sketches of individual people's thinking in 2020, showing how Two Minds Theory can help us frame and understand the things that people report about their life experiences from the mundane to the miraculous.
•  More connections – In 2019 I explored links between Two Minds Theory and earlier theories of mind, including Plato’s and Aristotle’s, as well as contemporary theories of mind like Churchland's AI-based model of the Narrative System, Gaillot and Baumeister's hypothesis that willpower is a function of blood glucose levels, and Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect Theory. This year look for more exploration of TMT’s sources and parallels, such as Freud’s theory of the unconscious, Benjamin Libet’s studies of consciousness, and the contemporary model of Naturalistic Decision Making.
•  More interventions – in 2018 the single most-read post was about cognitive reframing, an intervention strategy that works mainly with the Intuitive mind. Other intervention posts described behaviorist strategiesmotivational interviewing, and therapeutic writing. Expect more posts in 2020 exploring empirically supported interventions that all work despite the fact that they come out of radically different assumptions about human nature and the reasons people have problems. TMT may provide a common set of principles underlying many effective behavior-change interventions.
•  More clinical applications – in 2018 I posted on the role of Intuitive-level behaviors in the continuum of care for HIV, and posts in 2019 touched on asthmaopioid use disordersand diabetesIn the coming year, look for more applications of TMT to specific clinical populations like adolescents and people with lower-limb amputation. I will also be able to say more soon about the first study that tested propositions derived from TMT, about the Intuitive mind’s role in fatigue among people with HIV.

In 2019 this space provided an opportunity to explore many ideas and implications that didn’t fit into the original paper on Two Minds Theory. It also facilitated discussion and stimulated further thinking. Twelve months in, I’m having a great time writing and hope you enjoy reading. Thanks for your support and happy new year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...

Trump vs. Truth: the Whorfian Hypothesis Revisited

Image of protest against the 1918 Sedition Act during World War I. That act was repealed in 1920. Many concerning things have happened in the United States over the past month, but the one I'd like to write about today is an effort to win arguments by redefining terms. In a recent article titled "In Trump's Washington, Words Become Weaponized," the New York Times  presents a variety of examples in which the White House's recent Executive Orders use terms in ways that are unusual, or in some cases literally opposite from the term's plain-language meaning. Here are some notable instances (if you're up on all the news, you can skip to the part after the bullets, but I do like to document my sources): The term "DEI" (for  diversity, equity, and inclusion ) was used as a pejorative in President Trump's press conference after a January 30 airplane crash, in which he said that "we need to have our smartest people" as air traffic controll...

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...