Skip to main content

What to Watch for in 2020

I have been writing this blog for just over a year. My initial commitment to myself was that I would try it for 6 months, and if nobody cared or I ran out of things to say I would drop it. That hasn’t happened — there have been about 350 unique readers in the first year, and my list of ideas for posts is longer now than when I started. Both of those seem like promising signs. Still, 350 isn’t a lot in the world of the Internet, even for a somewhat specialized academic blog like this one. So if you like an idea that you read in this space, please comment, repost, or otherwise pass it along. I will keep trying to get the page out to new readers, and I’d appreciate your help.

Here is some of what you can look for in this space in 2020:
•  More on mindfulness – previous posts on how mindfulness can help us to comment the Narrative and the Intuitive Minds, and the use of new sensor technologies to study mindfulness, were each very popular. In 2020 I plan to explore the current state of mindfulness research, new directions that have been suggested in the literature, and how Two Minds Theory can help.
•  More case studies – I wrote posts in 2019 on “the two minds of …” various people, including Christian apologist C. S. Lewis, former U.S. Prosecutor Preet Bharara, and my good friend Cliston Brown. Look for more of these sketches of individual people's thinking in 2020, showing how Two Minds Theory can help us frame and understand the things that people report about their life experiences from the mundane to the miraculous.
•  More connections – In 2019 I explored links between Two Minds Theory and earlier theories of mind, including Plato’s and Aristotle’s, as well as contemporary theories of mind like Churchland's AI-based model of the Narrative System, Gaillot and Baumeister's hypothesis that willpower is a function of blood glucose levels, and Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect Theory. This year look for more exploration of TMT’s sources and parallels, such as Freud’s theory of the unconscious, Benjamin Libet’s studies of consciousness, and the contemporary model of Naturalistic Decision Making.
•  More interventions – in 2018 the single most-read post was about cognitive reframing, an intervention strategy that works mainly with the Intuitive mind. Other intervention posts described behaviorist strategies, motivational interviewing, and therapeutic writing. Expect more posts in 2020 exploring empirically supported interventions that all work despite the fact that they come out of radically different assumptions about human nature and the reasons people have problems. TMT may provide a common set of principles underlying many effective behavior-change interventions.
•  More clinical applications – in 2018 I posted on the role of Intuitive-level behaviors in the continuum of care for HIV, and posts in 2019 touched on asthma, opioid use disorders, and diabetes. In the coming year, look for more applications of TMT to specific clinical populations like adolescents and people with lower-limb amputation. I will also be able to say more soon about the first study that tested propositions derived from TMT, about the Intuitive mind’s role in fatigue among people with HIV.

In 2019 this space provided an opportunity to explore many ideas and implications that didn’t fit into the original paper on Two Minds Theory. It also facilitated discussion and stimulated further thinking. Twelve months in, I’m having a great time writing and hope you enjoy reading. Thanks for your support and happy new year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prototypes and Willingness: The Theory of Planned Behavior Revisited

  You may recall my blog post from last year on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , titled "in praise of a failed model." My evaluation of this model was that it accurately describes the Narrative Mind, which does control intentions. But the ultimate goal of the TPB is to predict behavior, and the relationship between intentions and behavior is weak at best -- in fact, it is entirely attributable to the fact that when someone says they don't intend to do something, they probably won't do it. When they say they do intend to do it, their actual results are no better than chance, a result of the intention-behavior gap as described in Two Minds Theory.  The full TPB is shown in this diagram: Cognitive constructs like attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (i.e., self-efficacy) are Narrative-system phenomena, and they do indeed have relationships with each other and with intentions (which are also products of the Narrative Mind). Perceived behavi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leventhal's Common-Sense Model and Two Minds Theory

Leventhal, Diefenbach, and Leventhal's (1992) "common sense model" of self-regulation. My 2018 paper describing Two Minds Theory (TMT) cites work by my colleague and coauthor Dr. Paula Meek, who conducted studies of patients experiencing the symptom of breathlessness due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Paula's research used a model by Howard and Elaine Leventhal (with Michael Diefenbach) that was an early iteration of the dual-process approach also used in TMT. She found that people who focused their attention on different aspects of the feeling of breathlessness then in turn had different interpretations of what that symptom meant for them, and that those interpretations changed their perception of the symptom's intensity. This example illustrates a back-and-forth between perceptions and thoughts, which is characteristic of Leventhal's model. Leventhal's dual-process model, sometimes called the "common sense model" of self-reg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intuitive Decision-Making by People with Diabetes

People with diabetes often find it challenging to maintain their blood sugar levels, in part because diabetes is a complicated disease. When the kidneys don't produce enough insulin fast enough to adjust for changes in digestion or activity, blood sugar can fluctuate rapidly, even over the course of a single day. To manage this, people with diabetes often need to make changes in multiple areas: adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, managing the timing and amount of exercise they get, keeping track of the times when their blood sugar rises and falls, potentially giving themselves a dose of insulin around mealtimes, managing stress, and other preventive measures as well.  But despite all of this complexity, the people who manage their diabetes most successfully are often the least  obsessive about the fine details. When my Dad was first diagnosed with diabetes, he checked his blood sugar often (using finger sticks; continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] devices weren’t yet a thing). Bu...
Post a Comment
Read more