Skip to main content

What to Watch for in 2020

I have been writing this blog for just over a year. My initial commitment to myself was that I would try it for 6 months, and if nobody cared or I ran out of things to say I would drop it. That hasn’t happened — there have been about 350 unique readers in the first year, and my list of ideas for posts is longer now than when I started. Both of those seem like promising signs. Still, 350 isn’t a lot in the world of the Internet, even for a somewhat specialized academic blog like this one. So if you like an idea that you read in this space, please comment, repost, or otherwise pass it along. I will keep trying to get the page out to new readers, and I’d appreciate your help.

Here is some of what you can look for in this space in 2020:
•  More on mindfulness – previous posts on how mindfulness can help us to comment the Narrative and the Intuitive Minds, and the use of new sensor technologies to study mindfulness, were each very popular. In 2020 I plan to explore the current state of mindfulness research, new directions that have been suggested in the literature, and how Two Minds Theory can help.
•  More case studies – I wrote posts in 2019 on “the two minds of …” various people, including Christian apologist C. S. Lewis, former U.S. Prosecutor Preet Bharara, and my good friend Cliston Brown. Look for more of these sketches of individual people's thinking in 2020, showing how Two Minds Theory can help us frame and understand the things that people report about their life experiences from the mundane to the miraculous.
•  More connections – In 2019 I explored links between Two Minds Theory and earlier theories of mind, including Plato’s and Aristotle’s, as well as contemporary theories of mind like Churchland's AI-based model of the Narrative System, Gaillot and Baumeister's hypothesis that willpower is a function of blood glucose levels, and Kahneman and Tversky’s Prospect Theory. This year look for more exploration of TMT’s sources and parallels, such as Freud’s theory of the unconscious, Benjamin Libet’s studies of consciousness, and the contemporary model of Naturalistic Decision Making.
•  More interventions – in 2018 the single most-read post was about cognitive reframing, an intervention strategy that works mainly with the Intuitive mind. Other intervention posts described behaviorist strategies, motivational interviewing, and therapeutic writing. Expect more posts in 2020 exploring empirically supported interventions that all work despite the fact that they come out of radically different assumptions about human nature and the reasons people have problems. TMT may provide a common set of principles underlying many effective behavior-change interventions.
•  More clinical applications – in 2018 I posted on the role of Intuitive-level behaviors in the continuum of care for HIV, and posts in 2019 touched on asthma, opioid use disorders, and diabetes. In the coming year, look for more applications of TMT to specific clinical populations like adolescents and people with lower-limb amputation. I will also be able to say more soon about the first study that tested propositions derived from TMT, about the Intuitive mind’s role in fatigue among people with HIV.

In 2019 this space provided an opportunity to explore many ideas and implications that didn’t fit into the original paper on Two Minds Theory. It also facilitated discussion and stimulated further thinking. Twelve months in, I’m having a great time writing and hope you enjoy reading. Thanks for your support and happy new year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...
1 comment
Read more

Inside the Intuitive System: The Mardi Gras Effect

Last Tuesday was Mardi Gras, traditionally a day of excess just before the start of the church season of Lent. Lent (from the Old English lencten  meaning "springtime") is one of two penitential times in the Christian church year, when people are asked to repent for their sins and engage in various forms of self-denial. Many people still talk about "giving something up" for Lent. It seems ironic, then, that the season of Lent should start with a scheduled day of debauchery, "Fat Tuesday" in French, when people are encouraged to eat pancakes or King Cake, drink alcohol, dress in outlandish outfits, and dance in the streets. The event even has theological underpinnings: Medieval clergy offered pre-planned absolution at the start of Lent on the day that is also called "Shrove Tuesday," from the Old English verb shrive (adjective: shrove or shriven) meaning "to offer forgiveness from sins." Lent always made a certain sort of sense to me fro...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Multitasking Mind: Intuitive Thinking is a Set of Systems

We think of the Intuitive system as representing emotion, or impulse, or other negative attributes. But Plato and Aristotle also attributed positive functions such as love, empathy, duty, and honor to the Intuitive Mind. These examples show us that the Intuitive Mind isn't just one thing. Rather than describing it as a system, it may be more accurate to describe the Intuitive Mind as a set  of systems.  Evans and Stanovich (2009) suggested that Intuitive Mind activities have the common characteristic of autonomy , meaning that they are self-executing without a person paying any conscious attention to them. (This is clearly different from Narrative Mind activities, which require ongoing focus to maintain them). Some examples of autonomous mental processes are: jumping when you hear a loud noise (instinctive behavior), turning off your alarm when you wake up (Pavlovian learned behavior), checking for coins in the vending machine change drop (Skinnerian reinforced behavior), rem...
1 comment
Read more