Skip to main content

2020 on the Two Minds Blog


As I feel a wave of relief that 2020 is finally over, I wanted to take a look back and a look ahead at the status of this blog. This year I wrote 27 posts for the Two Minds Blog, and there were 477 unique readers (many who came back repeatedly). That's up from 350 readers in the blog's first year; if you like what I've been writing here, please tell your friends and help readership continue to grow.

Last January I had promised to write on the following topics: more on mindfulness, more case studies about the "two minds of ..." individual people, more links between Two Minds Theory and other psychological theories, more on intervention strategies, and more clinical applications. We had many of those things, but also quite a few digressions on topics inspired by the coronavirus pandemic. In fact, some of the most popular posts were coronavirus-related, including one with initial thoughts on how to cope with COVID-related distress, one on how the difference between risk and uncertainty made it hard to know whether to open schools, and one about why some people still don't wear masks for COVID-19 prevention. I also wrote a popular post about how scientists use their two minds to get closer to the truth, which was written back in February but turned out to be very relevant year-round: Perhaps more than ever before, non-scientists were trying to make everyday decisions based on emerging science throughout 2020. Hopefully next year the pandemic will less often be a source of inspiration! 

In 2021, I anticipate writing about ...
  • More specific clinical populations and applications, similar to this year's popular post on the two minds of adolescents, and one in April on how the Intuitive mind hijacks the brain in cases of opioid addiction. Next year I anticipate writing more about HIV research, which has occasionally featured in this space via articles on behavior change and fatigue research. In 2021 I will be part of a study using TMT-based tailored text messages to promote exercise for people living with HIV, and I expect to highlight some early work from that study in the next few months. My and colleagues' HIV research was recently featured in the CU Nursing alumni newsletter, including work by my PhD student Lucy Graham and the new HEALTH exercise study with colleagues Kathy Jankowski and Kristine Erlandson.
  • More case studies that explore people's two-minds experiences. My 2020 blog posts in this genre included a piece about Dr. Vic Strecher's experience finding meaning in life after his daughter's death through both narrative and intuitive means, a post about the “out-of-time” experience that many of us had because of pandemic-related disruptions in our Intuitive-level timekeeping mechanisms, and a post on my own experience of conflict between the Narrative and Intuitive systems after a head injury damaged my sense of balance. I plan to continue writing about interesting two-minds case studies as these might come my way.
  • More on theories and behavior change methods, such as two articles this year that applied the two-minds elements of Dr, Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory to COVID-19 related public health decisions, and to the political aftermath of the 2020 election. This year I also looked at Naturalistic Decision Making theory, which emphasizes the use of Intuitive-level strategies to achieve better results under conditions of uncertainty. I revisited the theories of Sigmund Freud to see whether psychoanalytic ideas might be interpretable through a Two Minds lens. And I took a deep dive into neuroscience with a post on historical patient Phineas Gage and how more recent research contradicts the notion of "executive control" that Gage's case was supposed to exemplify. The topic of interventions was relatively neglected, but in early 2021 I have a couple of pieces ready that identify Two Minds interventions in different schools of psychotherapy.  I also wrote less this year on mindfulness than I had expected to, perhaps because the constant pandemic-related stressors made it harder to be mindful! I plan to return to that topic in 2021.
  • More on sensors and other measures to capture the workings of the Intuitive mind. In 2020 I wrote about using FitBits to predict fatigue, measuring people’s experiences in the moment using smartphone surveys, understanding the meaning of heart rate variability data, and the effects of sleep which is an Intuitive-level influence that’s measurable using the microphones on most people’s phones (try the free Sleep Cycle app, or the sleep-tracking function on Apple Health). In the coming year I expect to finish another paper on predictors of exercise using FitBit data, will hopefully have something new on heart rate variability as a predictor of treatment adherence, and might be able to share early findings from some new research using brainwaves. As technology continues to progress, we will gain even more windows into the Intuitive mind.
I have now been writing this blog for about 2 years, and sometimes I'm asked whether I do it for my job. The answer is yes and no: Blogging doesn't get you a lot of credit in academia, where "publish or perish" still means mainly peer-reviewed papers. So in that sense the blog takes time away from my day job for no immediate reward. But this type of writing is also a way to deepen and expand on ideas that I do use in my own research, and it has generated a lot of interesting dialogue. The more I write, the better I understand the ideas of Two Minds Theory and the better I am able to apply them in my work. So as long as people are still reading in 2021, I'll still be writing; I'm looking forward to more discoveries ahead!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does Psychotherapy Work? Look to the Intuitive Mind for Answers

  Jerome Frank's 1961 book Persuasion and Healing  popularized the idea of "common factors" that explain the benefits of psychotherapy, building on ideas that were first articulated by Saul Rosenzweig in 1936 and again by Sol Garfield in 1957. Frank's book emphasized the importance of (a) the therapeutic relationship, (b) the therapist's ability to explain the client's problems, (c) the client's expectation of change, and (d) the use of healing rituals. Later theorists emphasized other factors like feedback and empathy that are sub-components of the therapeutic relationship, and that can be clearly differentiated from specific behavior-change techniques like cognitive restructuring or behavioral reinforcement . Additional aspects of therapy that are sometimes identified as common factors include the opportunity to confront difficult past experiences, the opportunity for a "corrective emotional experience" with the therapist, and the chance t...

Trump vs. Truth: the Whorfian Hypothesis Revisited

Image of protest against the 1918 Sedition Act during World War I. That act was repealed in 1920. Many concerning things have happened in the United States over the past month, but the one I'd like to write about today is an effort to win arguments by redefining terms. In a recent article titled "In Trump's Washington, Words Become Weaponized," the New York Times  presents a variety of examples in which the White House's recent Executive Orders use terms in ways that are unusual, or in some cases literally opposite from the term's plain-language meaning. Here are some notable instances (if you're up on all the news, you can skip to the part after the bullets, but I do like to document my sources): The term "DEI" (for  diversity, equity, and inclusion ) was used as a pejorative in President Trump's press conference after a January 30 airplane crash, in which he said that "we need to have our smartest people" as air traffic controll...

Chatbot Changes and Challenges in 2023

I wrote last summer  about artificial intelligence tools that are increasingly able to approximate human speech in free-form conversations. These tools then burst onto the public stage with the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT  at the end of November last year. As you probably know by now, the acronym "GPT" stands for "generative pre-trained transformer," which highlights the three most important aspects of this technology: (1) it generates novel responses that aren't based on an a specific algorithm or decision rule, but instead rely on pattern recognition; (2) it has been pre-trained  by consuming massive amounts of writing from the Internet -- much more than a human could read in several lifetimes; and (3) it transforms  those prior writing samples using a trial-and-error process that predicts the next phrase in a sequence until it has come up with a response that seems intelligible to humans. ChatGPT works much like the auto-complete feature in your email or ...