Skip to main content

2020 on the Two Minds Blog


As I feel a wave of relief that 2020 is finally over, I wanted to take a look back and a look ahead at the status of this blog. This year I wrote 27 posts for the Two Minds Blog, and there were 477 unique readers (many who came back repeatedly). That's up from 350 readers in the blog's first year; if you like what I've been writing here, please tell your friends and help readership continue to grow.

Last January I had promised to write on the following topics: more on mindfulness, more case studies about the "two minds of ..." individual people, more links between Two Minds Theory and other psychological theories, more on intervention strategies, and more clinical applications. We had many of those things, but also quite a few digressions on topics inspired by the coronavirus pandemic. In fact, some of the most popular posts were coronavirus-related, including one with initial thoughts on how to cope with COVID-related distress, one on how the difference between risk and uncertainty made it hard to know whether to open schools, and one about why some people still don't wear masks for COVID-19 prevention. I also wrote a popular post about how scientists use their two minds to get closer to the truth, which was written back in February but turned out to be very relevant year-round: Perhaps more than ever before, non-scientists were trying to make everyday decisions based on emerging science throughout 2020. Hopefully next year the pandemic will less often be a source of inspiration! 

In 2021, I anticipate writing about ...
  • More specific clinical populations and applications, similar to this year's popular post on the two minds of adolescents, and one in April on how the Intuitive mind hijacks the brain in cases of opioid addiction. Next year I anticipate writing more about HIV research, which has occasionally featured in this space via articles on behavior change and fatigue research. In 2021 I will be part of a study using TMT-based tailored text messages to promote exercise for people living with HIV, and I expect to highlight some early work from that study in the next few months. My and colleagues' HIV research was recently featured in the CU Nursing alumni newsletter, including work by my PhD student Lucy Graham and the new HEALTH exercise study with colleagues Kathy Jankowski and Kristine Erlandson.
  • More case studies that explore people's two-minds experiences. My 2020 blog posts in this genre included a piece about Dr. Vic Strecher's experience finding meaning in life after his daughter's death through both narrative and intuitive means, a post about the “out-of-time” experience that many of us had because of pandemic-related disruptions in our Intuitive-level timekeeping mechanisms, and a post on my own experience of conflict between the Narrative and Intuitive systems after a head injury damaged my sense of balance. I plan to continue writing about interesting two-minds case studies as these might come my way.
  • More on theories and behavior change methods, such as two articles this year that applied the two-minds elements of Dr, Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory to COVID-19 related public health decisions, and to the political aftermath of the 2020 election. This year I also looked at Naturalistic Decision Making theory, which emphasizes the use of Intuitive-level strategies to achieve better results under conditions of uncertainty. I revisited the theories of Sigmund Freud to see whether psychoanalytic ideas might be interpretable through a Two Minds lens. And I took a deep dive into neuroscience with a post on historical patient Phineas Gage and how more recent research contradicts the notion of "executive control" that Gage's case was supposed to exemplify. The topic of interventions was relatively neglected, but in early 2021 I have a couple of pieces ready that identify Two Minds interventions in different schools of psychotherapy.  I also wrote less this year on mindfulness than I had expected to, perhaps because the constant pandemic-related stressors made it harder to be mindful! I plan to return to that topic in 2021.
  • More on sensors and other measures to capture the workings of the Intuitive mind. In 2020 I wrote about using FitBits to predict fatigue, measuring people’s experiences in the moment using smartphone surveys, understanding the meaning of heart rate variability data, and the effects of sleep which is an Intuitive-level influence that’s measurable using the microphones on most people’s phones (try the free Sleep Cycle app, or the sleep-tracking function on Apple Health). In the coming year I expect to finish another paper on predictors of exercise using FitBit data, will hopefully have something new on heart rate variability as a predictor of treatment adherence, and might be able to share early findings from some new research using brainwaves. As technology continues to progress, we will gain even more windows into the Intuitive mind.
I have now been writing this blog for about 2 years, and sometimes I'm asked whether I do it for my job. The answer is yes and no: Blogging doesn't get you a lot of credit in academia, where "publish or perish" still means mainly peer-reviewed papers. So in that sense the blog takes time away from my day job for no immediate reward. But this type of writing is also a way to deepen and expand on ideas that I do use in my own research, and it has generated a lot of interesting dialogue. The more I write, the better I understand the ideas of Two Minds Theory and the better I am able to apply them in my work. So as long as people are still reading in 2021, I'll still be writing; I'm looking forward to more discoveries ahead!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prototypes and Willingness: The Theory of Planned Behavior Revisited

  You may recall my blog post from last year on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) , titled "in praise of a failed model." My evaluation of this model was that it accurately describes the Narrative Mind, which does control intentions. But the ultimate goal of the TPB is to predict behavior, and the relationship between intentions and behavior is weak at best -- in fact, it is entirely attributable to the fact that when someone says they don't intend to do something, they probably won't do it. When they say they do intend to do it, their actual results are no better than chance, a result of the intention-behavior gap as described in Two Minds Theory.  The full TPB is shown in this diagram: Cognitive constructs like attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (i.e., self-efficacy) are Narrative-system phenomena, and they do indeed have relationships with each other and with intentions (which are also products of the Narrative Mind). Perceived behavi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Leventhal's Common-Sense Model and Two Minds Theory

Leventhal, Diefenbach, and Leventhal's (1992) "common sense model" of self-regulation. My 2018 paper describing Two Minds Theory (TMT) cites work by my colleague and coauthor Dr. Paula Meek, who conducted studies of patients experiencing the symptom of breathlessness due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). Paula's research used a model by Howard and Elaine Leventhal (with Michael Diefenbach) that was an early iteration of the dual-process approach also used in TMT. She found that people who focused their attention on different aspects of the feeling of breathlessness then in turn had different interpretations of what that symptom meant for them, and that those interpretations changed their perception of the symptom's intensity. This example illustrates a back-and-forth between perceptions and thoughts, which is characteristic of Leventhal's model. Leventhal's dual-process model, sometimes called the "common sense model" of self-reg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Intuitive Decision-Making by People with Diabetes

People with diabetes often find it challenging to maintain their blood sugar levels, in part because diabetes is a complicated disease. When the kidneys don't produce enough insulin fast enough to adjust for changes in digestion or activity, blood sugar can fluctuate rapidly, even over the course of a single day. To manage this, people with diabetes often need to make changes in multiple areas: adopting a low-carbohydrate diet, managing the timing and amount of exercise they get, keeping track of the times when their blood sugar rises and falls, potentially giving themselves a dose of insulin around mealtimes, managing stress, and other preventive measures as well.  But despite all of this complexity, the people who manage their diabetes most successfully are often the least  obsessive about the fine details. When my Dad was first diagnosed with diabetes, he checked his blood sugar often (using finger sticks; continuous glucose monitoring [CGM] devices weren’t yet a thing). Bu...
Post a Comment
Read more